Estate planning for valuable art (Part Two)

Lessons Brooke Astor could have used.

To continue our discussion from May 22.  Here are several additional options and considerations you may find appealing.

CRATs and CRUTs

The donor may determine how the income interest will be calculated with a CRT. There are two types of CRTs: the charitable remainder annuity trust (CRAT) and the charitable remainder unitrust (CRUT). The CRAT is designed so that the actual dollar amount distributed to the donor (and/or the other persons the donor designates) are fixed when the trust is created and funded. Generally the predetermined annuity amount will not change no matter how the trust assets fluctuate in value. A CRAT can be appealing to the donor who needs a specific amount of income and who is concerned about a change in income payments.

A CRUT is designed so that the amount distributed to the donor is recalculated each year based on a fixed percentage of the trust’s fair market value for that year. Unlike the CRAT, the CRUT is not a fixed annuity payment. The fixed percentage will not change; however, the amount that the donor receives can fluctuate. If the CRT performs well and the trust assets increase in value, so will the income interest payment, which is calculated as a fixed percentage of the increased trust value. However the reverse is also true, and if the trust decreases in value, the income interest will also be affected. A CRUT is appealing for the investment-minded donor who wants to benefit from increased income payments resulting from the long-term appreciation of the trust assets. There are various types of CRUTs, which should be explored in greater detail before the client makes a final decision.

A disadvantage of using a CRT for art is that because art is personal property, the income tax deduction may be limited significantly. In addition, when a charitable contribution consists of a future interest in tangible personal property, no deduction may be taken until all interests and rights to possession or enjoyment of the property have expired or are held by a person other than the donor (Sec. 170(a)(3)).

The tax benefits of transferring art to a CRT and later selling it include avoiding the capital gains tax on the sale of the asset and removing the underlying value of the asset from the donor’s taxable estate. Of course, the reason that the art is removed from the taxable estate is that it is no longer owned by the donor. For that reason, some donors couple the use of a CRT with what is known as an irrevocable life insurance trust. When used together, these tools replace the art’s value and keep that value out of the donor’s taxable estate.

Trusts

The client may also choose to make a gift (lifetime or at death) of the art to family members in trust. If the client wishes the art or collection to stay with intended beneficiaries, he or she can establish an irrevocable trust and transfer the collection to it. That will protect the assets from the creditors of the beneficiaries and preclude its value from being taxed in the client’s estate. If doing so, it is advisable to add enough funds to that trust to insure and maintain the art. Choosing a trustee must be carefully considered as the trustee or trustees will have the continuing ability to manage the trust assets, including the art.

Fractional Interests

A gift of a fractional interest in art should also be considered. However, the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) greatly limited the value of this strategy. Until passage of the PPA, a collector could donate a fractional interest in a work of art to a museum that qualifies as a charitable institution. Collectors did so for many reasons, one of which was that they could take a tax deduction for the value of the fractional interest. For example, if a collector donated a 50% interest in a painting to a museum, he or she could write off half the value as a charitable deduction. The painting would spend half the year in the donor’s possession and half the year in the museum’s. Unfortunately, this led Congress to be concerned that collectors may have been abusing the write-off by enjoying more than their rightful share of the art. For example, if a collector donated 50% of the art but kept it for more than six months a year, the public would be losing out on the painting’s availability during the excess period.

To address this perceived abuse, Congress changed the law to make donations of partial interests in artwork much less attractive for donors. Generally, before the PPA, the collector would bequeath the remainder of the fractional interest to the museum so the collector’s estate would take a charitable contribution deduction for the remaining current fair market value at the time of the collector’s death. But the PPA changed the law to require that the write-off be based on the art’s value at the time the original fractional interest was donated if the art appreciated in value, rather than on its value at the time of the collector’s death. If the art’s value has appreciated in that period, as it typically does, the law will reward the collector by reducing the amount his or her estate could take as a deduction for the donation and thus increasing the estate tax liability.

Consider the example of a painting worth $1 million when the collector first donated 50% to the museum. The collector bequeaths the remaining 50% of the painting when she dies, at which time it is worth $10 million. Under the old rule, the painting would pass to the museum and the estate would take a $5 million charitable contribution deduction. Under the new law, her estate may only deduct $500,000 and the estate would have to pay taxes on $4.5 million more than it would have under the old law.

The PPA also introduced recapture rules (deductions turned back into taxable income) that further reduce the desirability of contributing a partial interest in art. If the collector fails to donate the balance of the art to the museum on or before the earlier of 10 years of the original gift or the collector’s death, the collector will be forced to recapture the deduction. In addition to paying income tax and interest on the recaptured amount, the collector must pay an additional 10% tax on it. This essentially requires the collector to donate or bequeath the remaining fractional interest or lose the tax benefit of the original gift.

Conclusion

If the client has valuable art, it is important that he or she assemble a team of advisers that understands how to deal with it. The team may include an attorney, financial adviser, tax specialist, and an art succession planner. It is wise to make sure that the team members know the extent and value of the art and how the client intends to dispose of it so that it can properly be taken into account when establishing a financial and estate plan.

The decisions and choices as to how to preserve the legacy of artwork should be thought through with care and involve a discussion with the client, the intended beneficiaries, the charitable organization, and the team of advisers.

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

Patricia Annino Receives “Best in Wealth Management” Award

The Euromoney Legal Media Group chose Patricia Annino, Chair of Prince Lobel’s Estate Planning and Probate Practice Group, to receive the prestigious “Best in Wealth Management” award at the second annual Americas Women in Business Law Award ceremony held May 24, 2012, in New York City.

Selected from a short-list of eight well-known, highly-qualified nominees, Patricia’s award was based on extensive peer review research conducted by Euromoney’s research team, her professional accomplishments during the past 12 months, and her advocacy and influence in the field of wealth management.

Following the success of similar award ceremonies in Europe and Asia, the Americas Women in Business Law Awards was launched by Euromoney Legal Media Group to give law firms and professional services firms the recognition they deserve for their efforts in helping women advance in the legal profession.

Patricia Annino is a nationally recognized expert on estate planning and taxation, with more than 25 years of experience serving the estate planning needs of families, individuals, and owners of closely held and family businesses. She speaks regularly on many issues of concern to family owned businesses, including succession planning, risk management, managing a business with multiple stakeholders, the risk of divorce, and more. Annino is a graduate of Smith College and Suffolk University School of Law.

Patricia is the author of two widely utilized professional texts: Estate Planning in Massachusetts, and Taxwise Planning for Aging, Ill, or Incapacitated Clients. Patricia’s recent books for consumers include, Cracking the $$ Code: What Successful Men Know and You Don’t (Yet), Women in Family Business: What Keeps You up at Night, and Women & Money, A Practical Guide to Estate Planning.

About Prince Lobel

Prince Lobel Tye LLP is a full-service law firm providing a wide range of services for Fortune 1000 companies, closely held businesses, and individuals. Prince Lobel’s attorneys are guided by the highest standards of legal excellence, professionalism, and service – whether they are addressing complex business issues or providing advice on personal legal matters. Practice areas and industries served encompass corporate law, data privacy and security, domestic relations, employment law, estate planning and probate, insurance and reinsurance, intellectual property and Internet law, litigation, media law, nanotechnology, real estate, telecommunications law, construction law, environmental law, renewable energy, health care, and education. For more information, visit Prince Lobel at PrinceLobel.com.

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

Estate planning for valuable art (Part One); Lessons Brooke Astor could have used.

According to many who knew her, noted heiress and philanthropist Brooke Astor had a favorite painting, a Frederick Childe Hassam work known as “Flags, Fifth Avenue.” This American impressionist painting hung in a prominent place in her apartment since the early 1970s. Her son, Anthony Marshall, sold the painting while she was alive (and not competent) for $10 million and paid himself a $2 million commission. A short time after the sale, the dealer resold the painting for $20 million.

For many individuals and families, what to do and whom to trust with art is a thorny issue. It is important to consider the legacy of the work itself. Understanding the choices of who should receive it, who can afford to pay any estate taxes on it, who can afford to maintain it, who will use it, and who will appreciate it is an important part of the planning process. For many families these are not simple decisions. The right solution lies at the intersection of many complex and sometimes competing considerations.

Valuing art is an inexact science. No one can ever be sure what the market will bear. A first step to understanding the value is to get a qualified appraisal and valuation. The appraiser should be a member of either the American Society of Appraisers, the Appraisers Association of America, or the International Society of Appraisers.

It is important that the client understands the impact of taxation on the art in his or her estate (editor’s note: for more on this topic also see this Journal of Accountancy article.) For estate tax purposes, the gross estate of a U.S. citizen or resident at the time of his or her death, includes “the value of all property, real or personal, tangible or intangible, wherever situated” owned by the decedent at the time of his or her death (Sec. 2031(a)).

The IRS has established an Art Advisory Panel whose task is to assist the Service in reviewing and evaluating appraisals of artwork in conjunction with federal income, gift, and estate tax returns. (IRS Internal Revenue Manual, §42(16)4). The panel consists of 25 art experts. If a tax return containing art with a claimed value of at least $20,000 is selected for audit, the case must be referred to the panel. If the artwork exceeds $50,000, Rev. Proc. 96-15 (modified by Announcement 2001-22) provides that a request can be made for an IRS-expedited review of the art valuation.

The client should understand that with valuable art, more may be included in his or her gross estate than the art itself. Art may have to be sold and substantial commissions paid on the sales. If that is the case, it may be desirable to mandate in estate planning documents that a sale be made by the executor so that the commissions are deductible as administrative expenses. The only other way that commissions paid on the sale of the art after death are deductible from the estate is if the sale is necessary to pay the estate taxes. In other words, if the art is sold by the estate (for any reason other than it was essential to pay estate taxes) and the estate planning documents do not mandate that the art be sold, then the expenses of the sale, which can be significant, will not be deductible. Therefore, in essence, the heirs will be paying an estate tax on the lost deduction.

That is one reason it is important to have a frank discussion with family, beneficiaries, and any intended charity before bequeathing art. If a piece of art has always been in the client’s family and the client believes that his or her children wish to receive it, it is wise to have a conversation with the children or heirs to see if they want the art or if they are more interested in converting it to cash. In reality, the children or heirs may be unable to pay the taxes and the cost of maintaining the art.

The possible lack of deduction from the taxable estate for expenses attributable to the sale of art underscores how critical it is to discuss the art’s legacy with heirs and with any charitable organization in the planning process. If the client wants to leave the art to a charitable organization and the organization is willing to accept it, then the art’s value is included in the taxable estate and the estate receives a charitable deduction for the gift. If the charitable organization does not accept it and there is no alternative provision and the art is sold and added to the residue or passes to individual heirs, the expenses attributable to the sale are not deductible.

If, in the discussion about art, one family member does wish to receive it, then in the planning process you must carefully address how the estate taxes on that art are to be paid —who is to bear the burden of that tax? Is it the recipient or is it the estate’s remaining assets? Another option may be to consider what is known as a disclaimer—that is, the client leaves the art to the charitable organization or to a family member, and if they disclaim it (or choose not to take it) then the will mandates the sale of that asset to ensure that the estate will receive the requisite deduction.

If the client is considering gifting art to a charitable organization, find out now whether it is realistic for that organization to accept the gift and discuss any terms of the gift. Will there be any restrictions? Are those restrictions realistic? Are there endowment funds that will accompany the donation? It can be a burden to maintain and store art for a significant period of time. In my experience, donating funds to assist with maintenance and storage is prudent.

Charitable Remainder Trusts

Lifetime gifting options should be explored. There can be income tax benefits to making the gift of art—whether outright, in trust, or by fractional interest now. To assess the benefit, you must determine the income tax basis in the asset and quantify any capital gains tax that will be due on the sale. To avoid that gain, some clients consider transferring the art to a charitable remainder trust (CRT). A CRT (known as a split interest gift) is an irrevocable trust. The donor can gift the assets to the trust and retain the right to receive income for a predetermined period. When the income period ends, the CRT ends, and the remaining assets are distributed to the charitable organizations the donor has selected.

When the donor contributes an asset to the CRT, the donor will (in most cases) receive a current income tax deduction equal to the present value of the gift the charity will eventually receive when the CRT ends. Because CRTs are generally tax-exempt, appreciated assets can be gifted to a CRT and later sold without the donor or the trust owing capital gains tax. However, a CRT with unrelated business taxable income may be subject to a 100% excise tax on the unrelated business taxable income.

When the CRT is being established, the donor must decide the length of the income interest. In many cases, it is a lifetime payment stream (and/or for the lifetimes of one or more other persons the donor designates). As an alternative, the donor may direct that the income interest be paid for a specified period not to exceed 20 years. Once the specified income interest has concluded, the CRT terminates and the remaining assets are distributed to the charities that the donor has chosen.

Next week we’ll continue this discussion by looking at several types of trusts you may want to consider when making these types of gifts, as well as, the Fractional Gift option, and changes in the way these are managed.

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

How Psychedelic Drugs Can Help Patients Face Death & What it Means to Estate Planning Effected Towards the End

I recently read an article in the New York Times (read article here: http://nyti.ms/Kp9yct) about a study using Psychedelic Drugs to help patients cope with facing death as the result of a life-ending diagnosis, like cancer.  In the article it indicated that these end-of-life researchers only included otherwise healthy patients, those with no indication of mental illness, in the study.

These drugs are also being examined as treatment for alcoholism and other addictions.  While I can see the advantages of such treatment for those facing the end of their lives due to grave illnesses, it also makes me very aware of how this might affect the ability for someone to consider and finalize their estate planning needs at a time when they are not only facing their own demise, but while under the influence of psychedelic drugs.

Could this open up their decisions to scrutiny after their death?  Even though they are otherwise considered of sound mind, does this open the door for others to challenge a person’s Will or other estate planning functions finalized after such diagnosis, and while using psychedelic drugs.

I am an advocate for putting your affairs in order early on, long before you might be facing something like this, but the reality is, even if plans had been made, depending upon the individual situation, such a diagnosis could cause someone to rethink or alter their plans.

It seems like we would need to take some sort of extra steps during this process to make sure we can forego any challenges that could or would be made to change your final wishes.  I’m not exactly sure what that might look like, how we could provide verification of your ‘sound’ mind at such a time.

What do you think?  Leave your comments or questions below and expand the discussion!

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

Gifting Ownership of the Vacation House: A Gift or a Curse?

Ben Franklin once said that fish and houseguests smell after three days. But what if the houseguest co-owns the house? The perils of the vacation home, what to do with it, who should own it and what the rules are can be a source of family satisfaction and family conflict.

Under current law, the 2012 federal gift exemption is $5,120,000. Since many parents and grandparents are uncertain of their economic future, they may not want to gift assets that still earn income. Nor do they want to give away assets that have a low income tax basis that may be sold in the future. For these families, the vacation home is an attractive asset to consider gifting.

Gifting the vacation house to the next generation, or to a dynasty trust for the benefit of subsequent descendants, can remove that home (and any appreciation in its value) from the taxable estate. But before heading down that path, homeowners must carefully consider how that home will be owned post transfer.  We will explore three options: (i) outright ownership, (ii) an irrevocable trust (which could be a dynasty trust), and (iii) a family limited partnership or a limited liability company.

Outright Ownership

Often, the choice of making an outright gift of the vacation home is not appealing, whether the next generation owns the property as tenants in common, or as joint tenants with a right of survivorship. Many states have the right to compel a sale of that asset through a court proceeding, so the ownership of the home may be divisible in a divorce and subject to that family member’s creditors.

Also, family issues and resentments may develop with co-ownership. The child who lives out of state and never uses the home may resent sharing the expenses. Plus, with each generational transfer, the ownership becomes more fractionalized and the ownership of the asset is included in the taxable estate of each subsequent generation. There could also be conflict, such as who uses it the week of July 4th? Who pays for maintenance? Should rent be charged to cover expenses?

Irrevocable Trust (could be a dynasty trust)

A more appealing option for many families is transferring ownership of the home to an irrevocable trust. To complete the gift, the trust must be irrevocable, meaning that the donor cannot retain the ability to change, amend, or revoke its terms. The art of drafting an irrevocable trust is to remember that life is a movie not a snapshot, and that the document, while irrevocable, must also be flexible enough to contemplate the future.

The trust should address what happens to the child’s share at his or her death, whether or not the child’s spouse or stepchildren can continue to use the property in a divorce, or if the child predeceases his or her spouse. It should also address who is responsible for paying expenses, the line of succession of trustees, how the home should be furnished or updated, whether nonpaying guests may use the property, and who sets the rules for using the property.

Reasonable rules include who can use the property and when, the process for how that determination is made, whether use can be exclusive or must be open to all families all the time, payment of operating expenses, noise, cleanliness, pets, number of people, who pays for landscaping, parking, whether the property can be rented to nonfamily members, and other issues affecting the use and enjoyment of the property. The trust document can also address who has the right to determine the operating reserve and when income and/or principal may be distributed to the beneficiaries.

It may be also helpful for the donor to state intent – perhaps the use of the property is not intended to be equal, but based on relative degrees of interest in and ability to enjoy the property, and to take into account relative contributions (financial or otherwise) to its maintenance and improvement.

The document may also include a buyout provision by which one beneficiary (or beneficiary’s family) can sell his or her interest to other family members. Many families do not allow family members to cash out of their share in the home. An advantage to restricting what a family member can do to convert his or her share to liquid funds provides additional creditor protection and also helps keep that interest out of the taxable estate of subsequent descendants.

The trust should also address the mechanism by which a decision can be made to sell the home – should a decision that important be left only in the hands of the trustee? Should it include the trustees and all adults in the next generation? Should the vote be by majority or unanimous? The tension in that choice is that one family member who wants to use it more than others may block the sale for personal gain.

It is important to fund the trust with enough liquid assets to cover ongoing expenses and trustees. Future family discord might be avoided if family members who do not use the property are not expected to help cover its expenses. The funding can occur during the donor’s lifetime or at his or her death, through the donor’s estate plan. Once the property is transferred to the trust, the trustees should ensure that the property has sufficient property and casualty insurance coverage.

The trust document should also address the duration of the trust. It could end at a certain date, when the underlying asset is sold, when the trustees decide to end it, when the trustees and all adult beneficiaries agree to end it, when the Rule Against Perpetuities Period ends it, or if it is governed by a state that does not have any Rule Against Perpetuities, then it may never end.

Family Limited Partnership or Limited Liability Company.

A third choice is transferring the home to a family limited partnership or limited liability company, where the terms of the operating agreement control how the property is used. These entities are more businesslike than a trust, as they are members or partners. They offer the same benefits of the irrevocable trust, but may be more flexible. The operating agreement can provide a mechanism that allows it to be amended. If the entity is underfunded, the manager or general partner can make a capital call on the owners to contribute additional funds to the entity. As with the trust, the agreement will appoint a manager or management committee. The ownership structure can have two classes- voting and nonvoting. The transfer of ownership through sale or gift can be restricted.

Another benefit to gifting in this manner is that the valuation of the gift may have additional leverage and qualify for minority discounts or lack of marketability discounts. If the gift is not made all at once – but rather over several years – then all gifts are made off the record of the respective Registries of Deeds. In other words, the transfer to the entity is recorded initially, but ensuing gifts are transfers of the units or shares in the entity and are done within the entity itself, not in the Registry. This can save annual recording fees.  Additional benefits include income tax consequences in that each owner may have the benefit of the income and deductions flow through to his or her individual income tax returns.

Summary. Gifting the vacation house this year while the federal exemption is so high may be a very wise move. It is important for clients to think through their choice of entity and the considerations mentioned above before making this irrevocable decision.

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com

Donor Education & Financial Literacy

Educating the Donor about Tax Savings and Efficiency Matters

A significant advantage of financial literacy is that it can save the donor in estate tax depending on the type of gift made to institutions. It is important for donors to realize that inaction is involuntary philanthropy.  That is, what donors pay in taxes to the federal and state governments is spent by the government as it wishes on programs of its choosing.

So when donors pay taxes or give money without exercising any specific influence, they have engaged in de facto involuntary philanthropy.  That involuntary philanthropy can be at least partially converted to voluntary philanthropy by donating part of what the government would otherwise receive to charities of the donor’s choosing for purposes of the donor’s choosing.

Once donors realize that they have engaged in involuntary philanthropy, they are often motivated to consider philanthropic gifting. In other words, when the donor makes a private charitable gift and receives an income tax deduction for that gift, then the government loses part of its share of revenue and those funds are instead redirected to the specific philanthropic causes of the donor’s choosing.

Careful planning is needed to minimize transfer taxes, and charitable giving can play an important role in an estate plan. (http://www.360financialliteracy.org/Topics/Budgeting-Spending/Budgeting-and-Saving/Charitable-giving?print=1). By leaving money to charity, a donor may deduct the full amount of a charitable gift from the value of a gift or taxable estate. Understanding that there may be tax benefits and exploring what those benefits may be can be an effective way to start the giving conversation.

In particular the effective use of specific bequests to institutions, charitable lead trusts and charitable remainder trusts result in the donor and his/her family paying less in estate taxes. In 2011, generally, the federal gift and estate tax is imposed on transfers in excess of $5 million and at a top rate of 35 percent. (http://www.360financialliteracy.org/Topics/Budgeting-Spending/Budgeting-and-Saving/Charitable-giving?print=1).

Making an institution the beneficiary of a tax deferred retirement plan is the most tax efficient way to leave money if assets are greater than the federal estate tax exemption, as the charitable institution will receive the funds free of both estate and income tax. (Ann Kaplan. 2010.”Philanthropic Planning” Smith College, October 20, presentation).

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

Donor Education – Why Effective Donor Education Programs Are Important

One of the most effective ways to educate donors and help them achieve financial literacy is through sustained and focused donor education programs. The process of understanding the power of philanthropy and how it works best for a donor’s goals and objectives takes time. When donors learn together, share their ideas and understand what other donors have done and are doing, they become more comfortable with the process.

Donor education programs which focus on philanthropy and related topics, such as financial issues for women, can teach both men and women how to achieve the joy of giving while living. Your institution can incorporate into the donor education event faculty and student presentations which integrate messages into the mission of your institution. These programs can help differentiate/distinguish your institution and create deeper relationships with donors, alumnae, and alumni spouse (Women’s Philanthropy Institute 2009, 15). (8)

Effective donor education, combined with financial literacy, can also provide networking opportunities. Associating with women of similar financial standing increases their willingness to use their money to leave a legacy. This is especially relevant for women who are learning to be comfortable with their wealth. Many baby boomer women in this country will inherit twice—once from their parents and once from their spouse.  Nevertheless, donors will not give until they know that they can take care of themselves first. As an estate planning attorney, the most common question I hear from a new widow is, “Do I have enough money to live on?” (Of course that question should be asked many years before that moment in time.) Taking the time to systematically educate your women donors, to help them achieve financial literacy, to teach them that by gifting they can reap both current and future rewards will help empower them to act when they receive their “double inheritance.”

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

Polo club founder adopts his 42-year-old girlfriend

A rather unique attempt at protecting assets in a lawsuit. Thought you might find it interesting. What do you think of Mr. Goodman’s solution?  Leave your comments below.

By Michael Inbar

A wealthy Florida man has set off a firestorm by legally adopting his 42-year-old girlfriend as he prepares for a potentially costly wrongful death suit.

John Goodman, 49, founder of the Tony International Polo Club in Wellington, Fla., was involved in a crash on Feb. 12, 2010 that killed 23-year-old Scott Patrick Wilson. Local police say Goodman ran a stop sign while driving with a blood alcohol level twice the legal limit in Florida.

While Goodman faces criminal charges of DUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide and leaving the scene of an accident that carry a possible 30-year prison term in a trial set for March 6, he also faces a civil suit from William and Lili Wilson over the death of their son. That trial is set to begin March 27.

In recently released court documents, the Wilsons learned that Goodman had legally adopted his girlfriend Heather Hutchins in October. Attorneys for the Wilsons say it was a blatant move to protect his assets.

“It cannot go unrecognized that [Goodman] chose to adopt his 42-year-old girlfriend as opposed to a needy child,” The Palm Beach Post newspaper quoted family attorney Scott Smith as saying.

Palm Beach County Circuit Judge Glenn Kelley had previously ruled a trust fund Goodman had established for his two minor children could not be considered an asset in any court-rewarded damages to the Wilson family. Now, with Hutchins also considered Goodman’s daughter, she is entitled to one-third of the trust fund, and as an adult over 35 she can begin drawing money from the fund immediately.

Judge Kelley was critical of Goodman’s move in his order granting the Wilson family the right to information regarding the adoption. Kelley said the adoption “border(s) on the surreal,” The Palm Beach Post reported.

“The Court cannot ignore reality or the practical impact of what Mr. Goodman has now done,” Judge Kelley wrote. “The Defendant has effectively diverted a significant portion of the assets of the children’s trust to a person with whom he is intimately involved at a time when his personal assets are largely at risk in this case.”

While Goodman’s move has tongues wagging on the society scene in south Florida, a state adoption expert told WPEC-TV in West Palm Beach that Goodman adopting his girlfriend may not be strictly legal.

“Adoption means the act of creating the legal relationship between parent and child where it did not exist,” adoption attorney Charlotte Danciu told the station.

“Unless you intend to create the parent-child relationship, you are violating the letter of the law.”

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

PERSONAL FINANCE: When Valentines and prenups go together

I participated in this article and wanted to share it because it has some great information about the prenup process.  Enjoy!

By Kathleen Kingsbury (a Reuters contributor. The opinions expressed are her own.)

NEW YORK, Feb 15 (Reuters) – With a flurry of Valentine’s Day marriage proposals over, it could be time for new fiancees to take a financial reality check.

Four million Americans got engaged on Tuesday, as estimated by an American Express survey released in January. Unromantic as it may seem, everyone needs a frank conversation about finances before they walk down the aisle, including one that touches on
whether or not to sign a prenuptial agreement.

“All marriages terminate, whether it is in divorce or death,” says Patricia Annino, a Boston-based attorney and estate planner.  “Signing a prenuptial agreement is assurance your assets go where you want them to.”

Money issues are one of the most commonly cited reasons for marital strife. So, adding a candid financial assessment to one’s wedding to-do list might go a long way toward minimizing disagreements down the road.

 

WHO SHOULD SIGN A PRENUP

A common misconception about prenups is that they only apply if one partner brings in significantly more assets to a marriage, or in the case of May-December romances, where there’s a wide age gap. But they should also be considered by those marrying in
mid-career, or those remarrying.

“Statistics tell us that couples are marrying later in life, after they’ve had careers and separately built their own wealth. Or people are marrying for the second or third time,” says Steve Hartnett, associate director of education at the American Academy of Estate
Planning Attorneys. “These are the exact situations where prenups are critical.”

Equally important are situations where there are children from a previous marriage. “Parents will often want to be sure their children are provided for in case of their death, ” says Elaine Morgillo, a certified financial planner in North Andover, Massachusetts.

For younger couples, prenups are often sought when one partner stands to receive a large inheritance or holds a stake in a family business. Morgillo recalls one couple who had never been married and had similar incomes, but the bride-to-be expected an inheritance and the groom owned several rental properties.

“Inheritances aren’t always sacred, but she wanted hers protected and it helps to show intent,” Morgillo says. “She knew he felt the same way about his properties.”

 

GROWING IN POPULARITY

When her boyfriend of six years sat her down on their living room couch last Valentine’s Day, Christen Petitt Hailey thought she was about to get a vacuum cleaner. Instead, he proposed and the Tampa, Florida, couple were married last November.

“Before we were married, we came up with an arrangement where I always covered the mortgage and utilities, and she paid for groceries or entertainment,” says Shaun Hailey, 36, a mortgage underwriter. “She had slightly less income, so this division seemed to work out to be the fairest.”

Indeed, this kind of ad hoc divvying up is how most modern couples handle their finances. Many are realizing this might not be the smartest route, however.

“We like to say marriage vows today have become ‘love, honor, merge your finances,'” says Anthony Fittizzi, a wealth advisor for U.S. Trust, which recently launched a financial empowerment program to counsel clients ages 20 to 35. “Couples don’t necessarily take into account issues like the start-up costs of marriage, insurance, cash management or dividing property.”

Fittizzi’s motto: Sign on the bottom line before you say “I do.” Nearly a third of single Americans said they would ask their significant other for a prenup, according to a February 2010 poll by Harris Interactive. A second poll, by the American Academy of Matrimonial
Lawyers, found that 73 percent of divorce attorneys had seen an increase in prenups signed from 2005 to 2010, with more women initiating the process than ever before.

No doubt the high divorce rate has made prenups more acceptable, but the economy may be playing a role, too.

“With this uncertain economy, there is more insecurity about assets,” says Arlene Dubin, a New York City attorney and author of the book “Prenups for Lovers: A Romantic Guide to Prenuptial Agreements.” “Clients see prenups as vital to protecting what they’ve
built.”

 

MAKING A PRENUP STICK

Prenups generally cover real estate, estate planning, division of bank accounts, and alimony, in case the marriage should end. Child custody or support can’t be included, and protecting retirement or pension benefits may require extra steps. There are also steps that
should be taken to ensure that the prenup holds up in court. These include:

 

POPPING THE (PRENUP) QUESTION EARLY

Many lovebirds might find asking their betrothed to sign a prenup awkward, but waiting until the last minute can backfire. “You shouldn’t be bringing it up in the limo on the way to the church,” says Evan Sussman, a Beverly Hills-based divorce attorney. “From a
legal standpoint, you don’t want the other person to be able to claim duress later.” Sussman recommends the subject be broached before wedding invitations go out, or at least several weeks before the event.

 

AVOIDING FINANCIAL INFIDELITY

Prenups aren’t for every couple, but considering one often brings forth key financial questions that bring more honesty into a marriage. A 2010 poll by the non-profit CESI Debt Solutions found 80 percent of spouses spent money their partner didn’t know about.

Some attorneys recommend asking for a credit report. At the very least, Dubin says, “You need a line-by-line statement of assets and liabilities so you can deal with the ramifications.” Student loans, credit card balances, and IRS liens are some of the debts a spouse can later be held responsible for.

Still, Dubin says, “Before you start this process, prepare yourself for whatever may come. And know at what point you’d have to walk away.” The same, of course, goes for asking for a prenup and having your partner turn you down.

 

RETAINING SEPARATE LAWYERS

A second means to challenge a prenup in court is if the couple are not represented by separate attorneys. This is to guarantee that one spouse, usually the less-wealthy partner, is not taken advantage of.

“Imagine if Mark Zuckerberg wanted to marry his housekeeper who didn’t speak English and he insisted she sign a prenup,” Hartnett says. “Having a competent lawyer on both sides of the table means each party gets a fair agreement.”

That said, when choosing legal representation, be sure the attorney you choose understands this is the start of a marriage, not the end.

“When a lawyer is overly adversarial, it can lead to a lot of distrust and ‘do you love me’ questions,” says Cicily Maton, partner at the Chicago firm Aequus Wealth Management. “You should choose an advocate, but do your due diligence about their style.”

Of course, prenuptial agreements can always be renegotiated as a marriage evolves. “The first draft can always be torn up,” says Ginita Wall, a San Diego-based certified financial planner. “I had one set of clients on the sixth iteration of their prenup when they decided to divorce.”

For the Haileys, being engaged meant much financial discussion. They chose in marriage to keep all their finances separate, including their tax filings. They didn’t opt for a prenup, but “getting it all out on the table upfront means no surprises,” Shaun Hailey says.

Instead, he says, “We can concentrate on saving for the important things, like a honeymoon.” (Editing by Jilian Mincer, Bernadette Baum and Andrew Hay)

Source: © Thomson Reuters 2011. Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News | Reuters.com http://www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USL2E8DFF4Y20120215

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

New Risks to Wealth Management: To Gift or Not to Gift

Traditional risks related to the family’s wealth (including financial, intellectual and social assets) include the illness or death of the key family stakeholder, economic downturn and changes in the regulatory or legal environment. New risks are triggered by the dissipation of wealth due to generational mathematics—with each ensuing generation, the wealth is splintered—and the lack of creation of new wealth; this very turbulent economic time; the increased complexity of legal and tax matters; and the increased complexity of wealth management choices. These risks can be mitigated when the family coordinates its advisors and monitors the integration of all professional services.

The risks are further mitigated when the family embraces and encourages financial education and financial literacy across the generations. Mentoring, shadowing, exposure to the concepts and resources along the generation continuums reduces the chances for unintended consequences.

New Risk: The Bracket Game:  To Gift or Not to Gift…That Is The Question…..

On December 17, 2010, President Obama signed the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the Act). The Act significantly changes the federal estate tax, which impacts estate planning for many and presents significant estate planning opportunities. The biggest surprise in the new law is the ability to give $5,000,000 of assets away now and remove those assets and any appreciation in their value from the donor’s taxable estate. In a marriage, this doubles the amount to $10,000,000. This law is in effect until December 31, 2012, and it is unclear what the state of the law will be from 2013 on.

This significant increase in the gift exemption adds to the donor’s ability to gift the annual exclusion of $13,000 each year and the donor’s ability to pay anyone’s tuition and medical expenses as long as payment is made to the provider.

The Act has prompted spirited discussions, “Well, now that I can really give that much, should I? What are the non tax risks to making those gifts?”

     Factors to consider when deciding whether to gift or not to gift:

1.     How much is enough?

This question is always worth discussing. Warren Buffet’s answer is, “Leave your children enough money so they can do anything, but not enough that they don’t have to do anything (although Buffet did not leave his children the bulk of his fortune, he did leave each of them a foundation of $1billion dollars to give to the charities of their choosing).  In my experience, the answer depends upon the individual, often changes over the lifetime of the donor and has to do with his/her children and the economic times.

2.     What strings do I want on the gift?

Whatever the amount, you must decide how much control there    is over the gift. Is it to be given outright? In trust? Who is the trustee? How long should the trust extend? What are the terms of distribution? Who are the permissible beneficiaries?

3.     Should I leverage the gift?

In addition to the strings that you want to impose on the gift, you should also address leverage. If you make a gift that is eligible for a minority or marketability discount, that increases the value of the gift by at least 20%. If you fund an irrevocable trust and anticipates that the trustee will use the funds to make annual life insurance premium payments, then significantly more may be added to the trust through leverage than if the gift were to be invested along more traditional methods.

4.     Am I willing to assume the risk that the gift, once given, is gone?

What if the donee becomes divorced or has creditor issues during the donor’s lifetime, and the gift is jeopardized? Can you live with that consequence? The cascading effects from a gift can have far reaching consequences. For example, if the donor parent gifts 20% of the stock in his closely held business to his children; and one of the children becomes divorced, it is not just that the child’s interest in the business may be vulnerable. Even if it is not vulnerable, the divorce court also has the right to order the valuation of the child’s interest in that business. To do that means valuing the business in its entirety;  and having that asset valued in a hostile environment—where the ex-in-law’s lawyer will try to value that as high as possible—will in all likelihood be in direct opposition to the donor parent’s valuation and appraisals for estate planning and transfer tax purposes. In addition, if the donee child is ordered to pay alimony or child support, then the income from the gifted asset will be taken into account when the court establishes the dollar amount. If the income is phantom income, which the child donee does not actually receive, that can present additional complications and litigation.

5.     Am I willing to give up the “fruit as well as the tree”?

In most cases, the fruit and the tree—meaning the income and the principal—go hand in hand. For example, are you ready to give away 20% of the underlying asset, knowing that the corresponding 20% of the income which is attributable to that asset will also no longer be available to you?

6.     Have I considered gift splitting?

Gift splitting—where one spouse makes the gift, and the other gives consents to that gift—is a very effective estate planning technique for the second marriage couple. Frequently, in that case, one spouse is wealthier than the other. If the less wealthy spouse does not have $5,000,000 of assets in his/her own right, then using the less wealthy spouse’s $5,000,000 exemption in full or gift splitting, with the wealthier spouse giving his/her assets to his/her own children can be a very creative technique. In effect, it doubles the amount that can be gifted. When considering this technique, especially if there is a prenuptial agreement or postnuptial agreement in place, care should be taken to protect the estate of the less wealthy spouse who consented to this gift or allowed the use of his/her $5,000,000 exemption.  The possibility that the exemption could decrease later, resulting in additional estate taxes in his/her estate to his/her beneficiaries, should be thought through and discussed.

7.     Should I gift more than the $5,000,000/$10,000,000 exemption and incur the 35% gift  tax?

For many very wealthy individuals, this is a question to consider seriously. The gift/estate tax rate has not been this low in eight decades. The difference between a tax exclusive gift and a tax inclusive bequest is significant at the higher dollar levels, and exploring this (especially if the underlying assets have significant growth potential or discount opportunities) should be an option.

 Solution: Creation of a Family Risk Management Policy Statement:

A solid family risk management policy contains the purpose, principle and procedure for implementation. The purpose of a family risk management policy may be to reduce the risk for family members, both individually and as a whole. Adherence to the policy would go far to protect the family’s human and financial assets and minimize potential liability. The principle of the policy may be to make clear that the responsibility is to identify the areas of high risk and to do whatever possible to mitigate that risk. The procedure of the policy may make it clear that each family member is expected to:

  • Achieve financial literacy with regard to his or her own wealth as well as the wealth of the family enterprise.
  • Draft and have both parties sign a pre-nuptial agreement.
  • Contact their insurance providers annually to review their insurance coverage to ensure that they are current and adequate.
  • Have in place basic estate planning documents: will, revocable trust, health care proxy, power of attorney for financial assets.
  • Participate in the development of an investment policy that is aligned with the family’s shared values.
  • Protect the family’s reputation by learning how each individual’s behavior, both positive and negative, can impact the family’s reputation.

A family risk management policy statement is dynamic. It should be reviewed and adjusted as the risks that families face evolve and change.

 

Patricia Annino is a sought after speaker and nationally recognized authority on women and estate planning.  She educates and empowers women to value themselves and their contributions in order to ACCOMPLISH GREAT THINGS in the world – and in so doing PROTECT THEMSELVES, those they love, and the organizations they care about.  Annino recently released an updated version of her successful book, Women and Money: A Practical Guide to Estate Planning to include recent changes in the laws that govern how we protect our assets during and beyond our lifetime.  To download Annino’s FREE eBook, Estate Planning 101 visit, http://www.patriciaannino.com.

css.php